This article introduces a platform navigator, inspired by the CNCF Platform Engineering Maturity Model, to guide organizations in building or evolving self-service data product platforms. It addresses common challenges like low adoption and offers a structured approach to assess current states and determine next steps for scaling data mesh implementations effectively.
Read original on Martin FowlerA data product platform is a foundational element for successfully implementing a data mesh architecture. It provides the necessary self-service capabilities and infrastructure for domain teams to create, publish, and consume data products autonomously. Without a well-designed and adopted platform, the promises of data mesh, such as decentralized data ownership and improved data discoverability, remain largely unfulfilled.
Many organizations face significant hurdles in achieving high adoption of their data product platforms. This often stems from platforms being too complex, lacking essential features, or failing to meet the diverse needs of data product owners and consumers. A common pitfall is building a platform in isolation without continuous feedback loops from its users, leading to a disconnect between platform capabilities and actual user requirements.
Platform as a Product
Treat your data product platform itself as a product. This means applying product management principles: understanding user needs, defining a roadmap, prioritizing features, and iteratively developing and releasing capabilities. Continuous feedback from data product owners and consumers is crucial for its success and adoption.
The article proposes a platform navigator, drawing parallels with the CNCF Platform Engineering Maturity Model. This navigator helps assess the current state of a data product platform across various dimensions, enabling organizations to identify gaps and prioritize investments. It encourages a structured approach to evolving the platform, moving from basic capabilities to more advanced, automated, and self-service offerings. Key considerations include data governance, observability, data sharing mechanisms, and development tooling for data products.
By systematically evaluating and enhancing these areas, organizations can improve platform usability, reduce friction for data producers, and ultimately drive broader adoption of their data mesh initiatives. The goal is to empower domain teams to operate independently while ensuring consistency and compliance across the data landscape.