This article explores the fundamental architectural differences between batch and streaming data processing, focusing on the trade-offs between data completeness and processing latency. It discusses various strategies, windowing techniques, and architectural patterns like Lambda and Kappa, which are crucial for designing robust data pipelines.
Read original on ByteByteGoData processing systems fundamentally choose between waiting for complete data sets (batch processing) or processing data as it arrives (streaming processing). This decision impacts system latency, complexity, and how data correctness is handled, especially when dealing with continuous data flows that lack clear end points.
Batch processing involves collecting data over a defined period or until a natural boundary (e.g., end-of-day, file completion) is reached, and then processing the entire dataset at once. This approach guarantees data completeness for a given batch but introduces higher latency. It's suitable for historical analysis, reporting, and tasks where real-time insights aren't critical.
Streaming processing continuously computes results from data as it arrives, prioritizing low latency and real-time insights. This approach introduces challenges related to data completeness, ordering, and handling late-arriving data. Systems must estimate data arrival and implement strategies to correct or reprocess data that arrives out of order or after initial computation.
Lambda vs. Kappa Architectures
Lambda Architecture combines batch and streaming layers to provide both comprehensive historical views and real-time insights. The batch layer ensures data correctness, while the speed layer handles low-latency processing. Kappa Architecture aims to simplify by using a single streaming layer for both real-time and historical processing, often by replaying streams from a durable log.