This article explores Raft, a consensus algorithm designed to be understandable and practical for distributed systems. It breaks down how Raft ensures all nodes agree on the same state, even in the face of failures, by electing a leader and maintaining a replicated log. Understanding Raft is crucial for building resilient, fault-tolerant distributed applications.
Read original on Medium #system-designAchieving consensus among multiple nodes is a fundamental challenge in distributed systems. Without it, nodes can diverge in their understanding of the system's state, leading to data inconsistencies and incorrect behavior. Raft is an algorithm designed to solve this problem, focusing on understandability and practical implementation.
Why is Consensus Hard?
In a distributed system, nodes can fail, network partitions can occur, and messages can be lost or delayed. Consensus algorithms must guarantee safety (correctness) and liveness (progress) despite these asynchronous and unreliable conditions.
Raft simplifies the complexities of consensus into three key roles and phases:
Nodes in a Raft cluster can be in one of three states: Follower, Candidate, or Leader. Followers passively receive log entries from the leader. If a follower doesn't receive heartbeats from the leader for a certain timeout, it becomes a Candidate and initiates an election, requesting votes from other nodes. The node with the majority of votes becomes the new Leader. This process ensures only one leader can exist at a time, responsible for all data mutations.
Log replication is the core of Raft. All client requests that modify the system state are appended as entries to the leader's log. The leader then replicates these entries to all followers. An entry is considered committed once a majority of nodes have durably stored it. This majority rule is critical for fault tolerance, as the system can continue operating even if some nodes fail.